| |
Operationalizing Open Innovation
|
 |
Steve Goers,
PhD
Vice President of Open Innovation & Investments
Kraft
Foods |
|
| |
Making the case for open innovation is clear and has
been well articulated across industries: rapid pace and
cost of innovation, majority of innovation from smaller
companies/entrepreneurs, and the realities of
constrained R&D budgets. What’s not as clear is how to
build the organizational structure and framework to
successfully operationalize open innovation. How to
embrace entrepreneurial behavior so important for open
innovation yet stay focused on key business needs? How
to ensure open innovation is not an isolated activity
but is embedded in everything we do? How to balance
longer term, bigger growth opportunities with the
reality of “putting runs on the board” quickly? Should
open innovation be centrally led or in individual
business units? This presentation will cover some of the
approaches Kraft has employed to define the “what” and
drive the “how” of open innovation. Organizational
design, key success factors, examples of in-bounding of
innovation and learning’s will be discussed. |
|
| |
Investing in Innovation |
 |
Kurt Estes
Director of Business Development, Early Stage
Accelerator
Motorola |
|
| |
In
today’s fast paced market, companies are rewarded for
being able to deliver innovative products faster than
their competitors. As the need for shorter cycle times
increases, it is becoming more important for companies
to develop ways to decrease cycle time within product
development and to look outside their organization for
technology that will allow them to create new and
compelling products/services for their customers. As a
result, companies are creating groups within their
organization specializing in driving innovative products
to market. Further, companies are beginning to embrace
all aspects of the concept of “Open Innovation.”
Motorola has groups focused on both internal and
external innovation. This presentation will give a high
level overview of Motorola’s activities in both internal
innovation and external “Open” innovation. Time will be
provided for discussing:
-
Key Success Factors
-
Organizational Structure
-
Key Learnings
|
|
| |
Implementing World-Class Open
Innovation to Drive Growth |
 |
Jo Mohr
Senior
Director, Open Innovation Team
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare |
|
| |
Can
open innovation take you from a 3% growth rate to a 13%
growth rate in 3 years? Yes, it can, and GSK Consumer
Health’s experience proves it. Join Jo Mohr as she
describes how GSK combined a HUB office structure with
the “Want, Find, Get, Manage” Model® to change corporate
culture. She will share how “not invented here” syndrome
was replaced with a totally new way to drive innovation
through the ‘Fusion’ of internal colleagues with the
outside world. Revenue growth is only one measure of
success. GSK’s metrics on time to decision, perceived
responsiveness to market, productivity and inclusion of
staff in decision-making tell a compelling tale. While
the transition from internally-focused to
externally-focused was not easy, the rewards are real.
|
|
| |
Developing
an Open Innovation Strategy |
 |
Richard
McArdle, Ph.D.
Director Open Innovation
QTG/Pepsico |
|
| |
Open
innovation for many organizations shifts focus from
narrow, internal solutions to the varied solutions
offered by the growing marketplace of ideas. Moving an
organization to taking advantage of these new and
numerous opportunities requires change in strategy and
structure. QTG/Pepsico R&D has begun this journey of
change.
Key challenges have been:
-
the development of
organizational structures and culture that will
actively insource ideas and technology
-
managing multiple,
simultaneous idea evaluations;
and
-
balancing the sourcing of strategic needs and
unexpected opportunities.
QTG
will become known as a preferred alliance partner,
whether involved with small companies/entrepreneurs or
large/current suppliers. Our strategy will evolve to
focus on the collaboration methods that create the
highest value for both partners. |
|
| |
Standards and Intellectual
Property: Strategies for Complying with One While
Protecting the Other |
 |
Michelle Lee
IP Counsel
Nortel |
|
| |
Standards are increasingly important in today’s global
economy. Many government procurement guidelines require
compliance with certain standards, and participating in
standards setting activities can be critical to a
successful product strategy. However, the intellectual
property terms associated with contributing to a
standardization effort can have far reaching results. It
is important that executive management understands when
standards are important and how to protect their
company’s valuable IP while participating in standards
related activities. During this interactive
presentation, Michelle Lee will cover the following
topics, and answer questions related to your specific
standards related issues:
-
What are standards - open standards v. open source
-
Standardization strategies
-
Standards and the development process
-
Protecting IP during standards setting activities
|
|
| |
Open Source Software: Overcoming the
Challenge of Developing in a Mixed Open Source and
Proprietary Environment |
|
 |
Jim Markwith
Licensing
Counsel,
IP and Licensing Group
Microsoft |
 |
Stephen J.
Davidson
Chairman
Information Technology Practice
Leonard, Street and Deinard |
|
|
| |
The
use of open source software in the IT environment and in
software in general is becoming increasingly widespread.
Open source software is not just used in desktop
applications, but is embedded in a wide array of
consumer products, from refrigerators to cell phones.
Executive management must understand the basics of open
source software, including when the use or distribution
of such materials or products could affect their
company’s patent portfolio or other IP.
This
presentation will cover the must-know aspects of open
source software, including:
-
Why you should care
about open source issues
-
Managing the use of
open source tools and materials in the development
of products to be distributed under non-open source
licenses
-
Managing the
development of non-open source products for open
source platforms
-
Managing developer
exposure to open source code
-
Bridging the Gap – working in mixed open source and
proprietary environments, and a summary of the GPLv3
|
|
| |
Relationship to Partnership
(R2P) - A Reality at Satyam |
|
 |
Dr. T S
Krishnamurthy
Sr. Vice
President
Satyam IES |
|
| |
Product design in itself is complex and co-developing
products can only happen by design and not accidentally.
It begins with a mandate and a mindset to do this. Once
the buy-in is established (What?), next step is
essentially a planning exercise (How?). On most of the
occasions there is a fair amount of confusion on
both these elements. “What” is essentially is decided by
the organization based on core and adjacencies. This is
a function of time as what is core to an organization at
one point in time may not remain so over a period of
time. “How” is the portion that addresses an
implementable plan comprising at a top level four
basic elements namely:
(a) digitization,
(b) common language and initiatives,
(c) meaningful metrics, followed by
(d) globalization.
Subsequently, competency enhancement and Centers of
Excellence pave way for the maturity over a period of
time. |
|
| |
Becoming OEM of Choice in a
Constrained Supplier Base |
 |
Thomas
Hilpert
Director,
Product Research - New Product Development
Hawker
Beechcraft |
|
| |
Commercial, Business and
General aviation manufacturers are experiencing
unprecedented growth. Most OEMs realize that the
traditional model of vertically integrating the supply
chain isn’t cost effective, and at the same time,
competition for talent is increasing. This has resulted
in strategic outsourcing, and more recently in
partnering for design services as well as manufacturing.
As the major Tier 1 and 2
suppliers have been consolidating to meet the growing
demands of a select few OEMs, the competition for
suppliers / partners has become fierce.
Hawker Beechcraft (HBC)
set out to become the “OEM of choice” within the tier 1
& 2 supplier community by using collaborative product
development within an Alliance Framework. As an OEM --
accustomed to working alone -- it was necessary to:
-
Define “What” the expectations were,
to ensure alignment between internal functions
-
“Find” the Tier 1 & 2 suppliers with the
right capability and capacity
-
“Get” the selected partner secured for a
long-term relationship
-
“Manage"
the relationship using a documented framework to
focus decisions and execution on end-customer value
By following this process
and identifying the partnerships that would (or would
not) work, HBC was able to minimize the investment of
the suppliers and gain advantage for future
opportunities. |
|
| |
Building Effective CoDev Alliances -
Partnership Selection, Evaluation and Relationship
Management |
 |
Julie
Gerstenberger
Director,
Kodak External Alliances
Eastman Kodak Company |
|
| |
The
traditional approaches alone, growing companies either
by internal product development and/or through
acquisitions, are no longer adequate in today’s
environment. In supporting and executing strategies that
leverage Open Innovation practices through the formation
of powerful relationships with external entities,
revenue growth for firms will result. Accessing
technology and business models early, creating options
and flexibility for the future, can provide a
competitive advantage for the firm.
Over
the past few years, Kodak has undergone a monumental
transformation from analog (film) technologies to a
digital world –- one of complete internal vertical
integration to a world where the boundaries between the
numerous players are not always crisply defined. Hence,
the ability to efficiently and effectively build strong
alliances is critical.
So
how does one go about building effective alliances? How
are the right partners selected and evaluated? How
should one measure success along the way? How does an
entire culture become more open and externally focused?
What are some examples of success? These and many
additional questions relating to building external
alliances will be addressed during the session. |
|
| |
Finding the Right Partner |
 |
Meg Sranske
Senior
Manager, Global Technology Acquisition &
Licensing
SC Johnson |
|
| |
Partnering with external companies to drive
identification, development and commercialization of new
products and services is no longer a competitive
advantage but a competitive necessity within many
markets and industries. With the marketplace for new
technologies and products changing at an unprecedented
speed, as well as the increasing costs of doing
business, few companies can develop innovative new
products quickly enough on their own. The question today
is not whether to co-develop, but instead, how to do it
well.
Partnering for co-development can dramatically grow the
capability of your organization to quickly deliver
profitable innovation. It can also create greater
opportunities for breakthrough leaps in leveraging
technologies against customer needs and wants.
Partnering can open the door for expansive new business
models – including new classes-of-trade, aisles and
consumers – that you wouldn’t be able to do otherwise.
Finding the right partner can be a journey in and of
itself – creating questions, uncertainties and
challenges within your new product development process.
This presentation will address what it takes to get the
right partner, including:
-
Strategy Assessment
(truly knowing your end in mind, assessing your
needs, how to enable your organization to be a good
partner)
-
Nuts and bolts process
of getting the partner (key criteria for selection,
identifying issue areas, creating “win/wins”,
frameworks and principles for structuring the
relationship, creating shared ownership and
accountability)
-
Setting up for executional success (getting projects
off on the right foot, establishing trust, creating
venues for strong communication, defining metrics
and driving performance)
|
|
| |
Optimizing Open Innovation
Initiatives |
 |
Julie Ennis
Senior
Manager
General Mills Worldwide Innovation Network |
|
| |
Through its General Mills Worldwide Innovation Network
(G-WIN), General Mills is building relationships that
are enhancing, complementing, and accelerating existing
innovation programs. While external partnerships are not
new to General Mills, the more focused effort to build a
formalized program has taken the external initiative to
new levels and has created unique business opportunities
for the company.
This
presentation will address the ways in which the G-WIN
team has evolved and optimized its approach to open
innovation over the past few years. This presentation
will cover lessons learned – from both project successes
and project challenges – in the areas of:
-
Organizational
structure: building stronger internal alignment and
relationships to improve the odds of success of
external partnerships
-
Corporate culture:
creating a portfolio of external tools and resources
to support a broad range of business needs and
opportunities across the organization
-
Partnership selection: evaluating partnership
opportunities for the strongest fit and best
potential to create unique business relationships
that benefit both General Mills and its partners
|
|
| |
Executing and Implementing Alliances:
The Challenges |
 |
Dr. Robert J.
Wills
Vice
President, Alliance Management
Johnson & Johnson |
|
| |
The pharmaceutical
industry, like most industries, needs a flow of new
products to remain financially healthy. Given the
complexities of human disease, the highly regulated
business environment, the high risk of failure and the
tremendous costs of bringing new products to patients,
sourcing new products from internal efforts is not
sufficient to sustain growth. In addition, the biotech
industry, which emerged in the 80’s as a focused R&D
business model, often doesn’t have the infrastructure or
expertise to engage in the costly late stage development
and commercialization. These two dynamics have led to a
natural progression of alliance formation.
The
more typical alliance of recent years is one of both
co-development and co-promotion, the later being used by
the biotech industry to build their commercial
infrastructure and to gain experience often at the cost
and oversight of the pharmaceutical partner. This broad
sharing of work and costs, along with the necessary
governance, has come with multiple challenges in
execution and implementation.
What
are some of these challenges? What approaches are used
to help mitigate these challenges? How do we manage
consistently across the multiple alliances that exist?
What has not worked? These and many additional questions
relating to executing and implementing external
alliances will be addressed during the session. |
|
| |
Applying
the Open Innovation Advantage to Build New Business |
 |
Martha J.
Collins, PhD
Business
Technology Manager, Advanced Materials
Air Products |
|
| |
How can a Fortune 500
company apply open innovation concepts to build an
entirely new business within an existing global
business? Martha will share the open innovation
strategies and tactics used to establish the Advanced
Materials Business at Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Using case examples she
will:
-
Present three very different and recent examples of
how to develop new offerings based on open
innovation; including what worked and what didn’t.
-
Outline methods used to address risk and manage
options in an open innovation portfolio.
-
Discuss the best
practices Air Products has found to be necessary to
operate and be successful developing new offerings
and new technology in an open innovation
environment.
In closing, Martha will
share some advice about how big companies can innovate
successfully with small companies. |
|
| |
Focus on the Baby, Not just
the Wedding
10 Factors for Success in Co-Development / Open
Innovation |
 |
Dr. Alison
Lukascko
VP, R&D
Church & Dwight |
|
| |
Drawing on experience in negotiating and managing a
range of co-development and open innovation initiatives,
Dr. Lukacsko will share what she has observed to be key
lessons learned. In addition to presenting 10 critical
success factors drawn from her Open Innovation
implementation experience at Church & Dwight, she will
also examine key areas that small to medium sized
businesses must consider before embarking on external
innovation including boundaries, alignment and due
diligence. Dr. Lukacsko will also highlight tools to
help you manage co-development decisions and
relationships effectively. |
|
| |
Leveraging Partnerships When M&A
Impacts Internal Resource Capacity |
|
|
Dr. Frederick
J. Montgomery, PhD
VP
Medical Devices
INO Therapeutics LLC |
|
| |
When
a small (300 employee) Specialty Pharma Company wants to
develop a medical device capability to control the
direction of its pharmaceutical delivery device needs,
it looks to development partners for the detail design
and manufacturing of those medical devices.
When unexpected M&A left
just a few key design architects of the product, the new
company had to leverage partners’ resources to develop
multiple products in a short period of time. Mr.
Montgomery will address how the strategy evolved, the
key decision points and lessons learned throughout the
co-development process.
Specifically, he will
examine:
-
Device Strategy / Startup
-
Selecting a Design Partner
-
Product Definition
-
Detail Design and the Split of Responsibilities
-
Selecting a Manufacturing Partner
-
FDA Approval and Product Launch
-
Lessons Learned
|
|
| |
From China to Canada.
From San Diego to Israel.
Spanning the Globe for Co-Dev Partners |
 |
Graham P.
Milner
Executive
Vice President
WD-40 Company |
|
| |
A
story of two new products set to launch in
2008…involving global partners that include: an
industrial design firm, based in Toronto, working with
us in San Diego; an Irish owned, Shenzhen, China-based
manufacturer; a Boulder, Colorado partner; a USA
company, owned by a Croatian and finally, another
Chinese manufacturer.
It’s
not a spy novel, not a movie…but for innovators maybe
more fun!
Two
new product paths, from very different sources – for
WD-40, a potential partners’ location is secondary to it
having the right attitude. We see one market...it is
global.
We see one source of supply...it is global. We see one
partner pool ...it is global.
Learn
how a small company leverages world class partners. We
will never be the biggest client… but we can aim to be
the best. The keys to successful co-development efforts
lie in selecting the right partner for the job, setting
clear expectations, and managing through inevitable
delays and hiccups.
Mr.
Milner will discuss lessons learned and shared from
WD-40’s journey down the Co-Development trail with
multiple global partners. |
|