| |
Creating New Value between Venture
Capital and its Corporate Investors |
|
 |
Roger Wyse
Managing
Director
Burrill & Company |
 |
Wayne J.
Puglia
Sr.
Director of Open Innovation & Investments,
Research Development and Quality
Kraft
Foods |
|
|
| |
Venture Capital has traditionally been funded by
institutional investors but increasingly corporate
investors have seen investments in VC as a component of
their open innovation strategy. Kraft Foods has invested
in Burrill & Company, one of the leading life sciences
venture capital firms, to broaden its open sourcing of
innovation and to gain access to emerging new
technology. New innovative approaches utilizing the
venture model to enhance value creation are being
developed. Examples include the Brand New Brands H&W
Incubator which spun out four new companies from product
concepts in one year and the next generation model, A
Brand Accelerator, to rapidly launch and realize value
from Corporate “stranded innovations”.
This
presentation will provide perspectives on the benefits
of VC investments, how to build the relationship to
maximize value, pros & cons of managing your own funds
vs. VC partnerships and early learnings from a Corporate
investor viewpoint. |
|
| |
Making a Corporate Research and
Venture Capital Partnership Pay-off |
 |
George Dies
Director,
Strategic Planning and Research Operations
HP Labs |
|
| |
Venture Capital (VC) firms are much more accustomed to
striking deals with entrepreneurs and start-up companies
rather than large corporations. The slower pace and
multiple levels of bureaucracy within large corporations
typically clashes with the speed and agility of VC
firms. However, finding a way to bridge these difference
business styles and set up a compatible business model
can yield a win-win partnership.
George Dies will outline HP Labs’ approach to working
with a VC firm, Foundation Capital, by building a
long-term relationship centered on technology
evaluation, versus individual transactions . He will
explore some of the key outcomes of the relationship for
both parties and the potential value that can be
realized from this open business model as well as
lessons learned.
Key take-aways include how to:
-
Select the right type of Venture Capital firm to
partner with
-
Manage concerns over IP leakage or contamination
-
Derive (and maintain) value from the relationship
|
|
| |
Key Steps for Formalizing
an Effective Open Innovation Strategy |
 |
José A.
Ramirez, PhD
Senior Director - Global Open Innovation
JohnsonDiversey, Inc. |
|
| |
JohnsonDiversey Inc (JDI) is one of the worlds largest
manufacturers of institutional cleaning and sanitation
products and solutions. Over the past three years, JDI
has developed a formal open innovation strategy. This
strategy involved creating a dedicated department for
Open Innovation and implementing basic processes to
source, evaluate and facilitate the adoption of external
technologies. Building on existing pockets of knowledge
within the company worldwide, JDIs Open Innovation group
is now fully functional with processes and tools
designed to harness areas of strength and improve those
that are lagging.
In this presentation,
Dr. Ramirez will provide an overview JDI's open
innovation journey and will discuss lessons learned and
key steps JDI took to:
-
Create a process for
handling unsolicited proposals
Establish a virtual, worldwide network for
initiative evaluation
-
Organize an efficient
and focused scouting function that leverages the
existing IT infrastructure
-
Revamp its intellectual asset management processes
to better suit the needs of Open Innovation
|
|
| |
How to Create Value and Drive
Competitive Advantage Through Your Licensing Program
|
 |
Amy Achter
Director
of Corporate Intellectual Asset Management
Kimberly-Clark Corporation |
|
| |
Licensing is a two-way street. In the context of Open
Innovation, licensing fundamentally implies that we are
creating value - return on investment - from assets that
one party alone could not realize. This can apply
equally to the acquisition of technology to meet our
strategic objectives and goals and to the out-licensing
of our IP to others with business propositions that can
leverage that IP to drive value in their markets.
In
this presentation, Amy will address four fundamentals
that are critical to consider as you embark on a
licensing program:
-
Know what you have –
understanding your estate is the first key step in
identifying licensing opportunities and the value
they may bring
-
Know what you need –
being connected to the business strategies that
define the “want” will enable you to seek out and
engage with potential partners
-
Understand your musts
– there are always critical criteria that must be
met – know what they are before you embark
-
Know the players - who are your sponsors, who are
the stakeholders and who else has influence and the
ability to impact
People, processes and tools all need to come together to
yield a successful licensing program. While this may
look different for different companies, you will hear
about some of the ways Kimberly-Clark has approached
this and where they have achieved success.
|
|
| |
The anthropology of open innovation |
 |
Paul France
Principal
Engineer, Technology Entrepreneur
Procter & Gamble |
|
| |
Connections are at the heart of the Open Innovation
business models. P&G’s ability to innovate quickly
depends upon employees’ ability to search out the best
ideas and approaches wherever they exist. Think global,
act local is in our blood. We get to know the consumer
better by spending time observing the consumer in their
homes rather than in focus groups. A similar approach we
apply in establishing trustful relationships with our
partners: we take the time to really understand their
needs and the cultural differences. The closer you get
to the end user, the more important it is to pay
attention to cultural differences. Partnership dynamics
are different when dealing with a wide range of local
partners, i.e. from the national labs to the small
family business. This presentation will highlight the
barriers as well as the enablers to get open innovation
to work on a global scale.
What you will learn:
-
Balance local
innovation with global integration
-
How
to build relationship-based networks
-
Lessons from P&G’s
Connect and Develop hubs in India, Japan, China,
Europe and the US
-
Resolving cultural
differences in partnerships
-
How to get beyond the “karaoke” experience
|
|
| |
Key Steps
for Overcoming Cultural Barriers to Open Innovation
Implementation |
 |
Sarah Pearson,
PhD
Open Innovation Champion
Cadbury |
|
| |
Cadbury began its open innovation activities as an
incubated pilot study within the protection of its
Global Science Centre and has evolved it into a globally
linked Open Innovation team charged with the mandate to
deliver commercially beneficial innovations by
partnering with leading organizations and academic
institutions. Internal and external cultural challenges
including varying geographic business structures, IP
ownership and negotiation expectations, speed of
reaction, short term activity and differences in time
scales and deliverables expectations surfaced as key
barriers to success.
Ms.
Pearson’s presentation will address Cadbury’s
step-by-step approach to break through these cultural
barriers by aligning its open innovation agenda with
corporate strategy, embedding it into the company’s
planning process and gaining buy-in from internal R&D
and marketing groups.
Key Take-aways:
-
Understanding the
critical importance of gaining senior leadership
buy-in and involving them in the planning process
for open innovation initiatives
-
Ensure that marketing
groups are aware of the possibilities that open
innovation affords and include them in direction
setting
-
Aligning your open innovation activities with your
commercial and R&D strategy can yield higher value
delivery to your business
|
|
| |
Making a Great Product Even Better
through Co-Development |
 |
Graham P.
Milner
Executive
Vice President
WD-40 Company |
|
| |
For
years, WD-40’s most loved product had received feedback
that the only room for improvement would be to create a
way to “not lose the little red straw”. However,
concerned about adding costs without significantly
boosting customer value, the decision was made to
maintain the status quo. This was not an acceptable
answer to WD 40’s Team Tomorrow—they were on a search
for innovation to deliver value for their end-users!
WD-40
relies on multiple world class partners to bring its
products to market and it was within one of its meeting
with a prospective industrial design partner that a
technology was discussed that had the potential to
resolve the red straw issue in a cost effective manner.
In
this presentation, Graham Milner will examine how this
Co-Development partnership came to fruition, what were
the key data points that helped determine if this
product improvement could be implemented without
significantly increasing costs, how much value would it
add to a product that is a market leader worldwide and
what are the preliminary results of making this product
improvement? |
|
| |
Tassimo Hot Beverage System -
Managing Success in an External Alliance |
 |
Andreas
Perschon
Director,
Alliance Management
Kraft
Foods - Tassimo
Global |
|
| |
Alliance Management has many forms. For Tassimo , it
means managing the relationships with both Kraft
(beverages) and Bosch and Siemens Home Appliances
(machines) to present the Tassimo system as one face to
consumers in seven different countries.
In this presentation, Mr.
Perschon will discuss:
-
The importance of
having synchronized cooperation between Kraft and
Bosch and Siemens Home Appliances to successfully
market Tassimo as a system
-
The
key focus of Tassimo Alliance Management is to:
-
Ensure that Kraft has a world-class network of
Alliance partners to maximize success
-
Set targets and performance evaluations for its
alliance partners and
-
Manage all alliance
related matters in conjunction with geographic
launches
-
Key success factors to
make the alliance work:
-
Win-win needs to be obvious for both partners, with
a balanced share or opportunity and risks on both
sides
-
One company has to have the clear lead, while the
other needs to be fully engaged ( and accept that
role)
-
Creating upfront clarity on the business model,
cooperation scope, objectives, KPI and roles &
responsibility
-
Compatible company business strategies and cultures
are pivotal to jointly live through hard times
-
A
“quadrangle” communication matrix ( Global – Global
plus Local – Local) secures the clearest way to
assure continuous alignment"
|
|
| |
The evolution of Open Innovation
metrics at Frito-Lay |
 |
Owen Carryl
Sr. Group
Manager, Open Innovation
Frito-Lay |
|
| |
Over many decades, Frito-Lay has built a strong business
and portfolio of iconic brands through acquisitions and
partnerships that leverage the capabilities and
expertise of seasoning and ingredient suppliers, product
developers, equipment manufacturers, universities and
consultants. Measuring the value of this open innovation
approach is of critical importance.
Frito-Lay measures the value of Open Innovation projects
by looking at Net Present Value (NPV), Return on
Investment (ROI) and Performance Metrics such as Trial
Motivation, Repeat Potential, Trade Margin and Store
Door Value.
In this presentation,
you will learn:
-
How to establish
accurate metrics for open innovation projects
-
Examples of different
Frito-Lay alliances and metrics used in each case
-
The key to accurate metrics is realizing they must
be project-specific and should reflect the desired
outcome for the project
|
|